The Importance Of Maintenance Cap-Ex

enance Cap-ExEquipment has been cut by two-thirds.
The nice thing about having low capital spending, isThe reason? Advertising. The majority of the
the pleasant surprise it creates. You find acompany’s operating expenses are
company that is earning more (economically) thanadvertising expenses. Let me put the difference
other companies with the same GAAP numbers.between the intangible asset of the
So, the P/E ratio tends to exaggerate how1-800-PetMeds brand and all of the
expensive the business is.company’s tangible assets into
This is kind of like finding a business with excessperspective. In 2005, depreciation expenses
cash. While it's true that a business can have toototaled less than 0.5% of sales while advertising
much cash from an efficiency point of view,expenses totaled more than 15% of sales. In
finding more cash on the balance sheet than youprevious years, advertising expenses were even
expected is always a good thing, right? The pointgreater as a percentage of sales.
in each case is that the headline numbers (EPS, PMy point is simply that some of this advertising
E, etc.) sometimes lie - and an inordinate numberspending (and I’m guessing a whole lot)
of bargains are found where such "lies" existcreates economic benefits in future periods. In
– simply, because others aren’tother words, economically, part of that advertising
looking there (it’s a less conspicuousspending is an investment, not an expense.
bargain).I’m not saying GAAP accounting should
"Wouldn't it mean the company wasn't reinvestingtreat the advertising as an investment in an
in P&E?"intangible asset, I’m just saying, the
Some businesses have a very strong relationshipadvertising is such an investment.
between the value of the assets in the businessSo, the pleasant surprise is the phantom
and earnings.investment. GAAP earnings in previous years
Others have almost no correlation between thewere lower than economic earnings, because an
two. For an example of a business that will likelyinvestment in future growth was treated as an
have very different ROAs from year to yearoperating expense.
(and longer-term) look at Forward IndustriesAgain, I think this is, in fact, how the item should
(FORD). A less extreme example is Craftmadebe treated by accountants. However, investors
International (CRFT), further down the spectrumneed to recognize the distinction and adjust their
(but still very asset light) you have companies likeexpectations accordingly.
Timberland (TBL) and K-Swiss (KSWS).To better explain what all this talk of accounting
For an example of a business, that long-term atfor advertising is about, I’ll provide an
least, has to add to assets to add to earningsexcerpt from the company’s 10-K:
look at Village Supermarket (VLGEA). In this caseThe Company's advertising expense consists
(as in the case of most retailers), the long-termprimarily of television advertising, internet
correlation between assets and earnings ismarketing, and direct mail/print advertising.
somewhat obscured by operating leverage;Television costs are expensed as the
however, logically at least, you do recognize thatadvertisements are televised. Internet costs are
a supermarket’s earnings will beexpensed in the month incurred and direct mail
determined in large part by the number (and size)print advertising costs are expensed when the
of the stores being operated.related catalog and postcards are produced,
Also on this side of the spectrum (businesses withdistributed or superseded.
a strong long-term correlation between assetsSimply put, the hit to earnings is immediate, while
and earnings) you have various businesses thatthe full economic benefits are only realized over a
own distinct, identifiable assets such as: themeperiod of many years.
parks, pipelines, parking lots, bowling alleys, golfThat’s what I meant when I said the EPS
courses, hotels, etc. Of course, you also havenumber (and thus the P/E ratio)
asset-heavy manufacturing businesses, especially“sometimes lie”. This is one of
in price sensitive, commodity-like products.those times. An owner would see the advertising
Both of these types of businesses tend to havespending differently than the GAAP portrayal.
more predictable returns on assets (at least onTherefore, he would believe the true P/E ratio
the margins). I add the qualifier, becausewas lower than it appeared to be.
it’s a rare business that is both capitalThe Value of Intangibles
intensive and highly profitable - although I'm sureIntangible assets are often harder to reproduce
you could name a handful of such conglomerates.than tangible assets.
Some asset-light businesses have predictableThere is a nearly infinite potential supply of new
returns on assets – not so much becauseplants and stores if a competitor wants to build
there is a strong correlation between assets andthem - and they can usually be built at the same
earnings, but rather because there is the absencecost regardless of who builds them.
of disruptive change and some real protectionAlready, if a competitor wanted to reproduce the
from price competition. An example would be1-800-PetMeds or GEICO brands, they would
McCormick (MKC) – a business that has ahave to spend considerably more than those
fairly predictable ROA largely because it’scompanies did, because both brands are fairly
simply a great business (albeit a slow growthentrenched within our minds - they've staked a
business).claim to the territory in our mind where we think
One of the greatest investing conundrums is the"pet meds" or "auto insurance".
fact that it is usually easiest to reinvest retainedYou can't reproduce those brands at the same
earnings at past rates of return in a poor businesscost. Furthermore, in both of these cases, you'd
and hardest to reinvest retained earnings at pasthave to lose money or accept a much narrower
rates of return in a good business.margin while you did build the brand up. So, while
In other words, many of the least limitedthe barriers to entry may not be obvious, the
businesses tend to be the least profitable, andbarriers to profitability and dominance are quite
many of the most profitable tend to be the mostclear.
limited. That’s why you hear me talk soBoth companies already own a little piece of your
much about “franchises” andmind. That’s valuable real estate –
“niches”.even if it doesn’t show up on the books.
I may not have played this point up as much as IHidden Bargains
should have. But, if I were forced to invest everyHow does one parse the numbers to find these
dime I had in a single business and hold it for thehidden bargains?
rest of my life, the first characteristic I wouldThere is no purely quantitative way of doing this.
look for is a business with virtually no need forQualitative considerations loom large in any
maintenance cap-ex.estimate of cap-ex requirements, because the
The Pleasant Surprisenature of the business and the competitive
The pleasant surprise is finding that the GAAPposition of the firm are key determinants of how
earnings are lower than the actual amount ofeffective new cap-ex spending is.
cash a 100% owner would be able to extractIf you can't explain why one company spends
from the business, if he chose not to expand itless on cap-ex than its competitors, you have to
(via additional spending).assume the current skimping on cap-ex is not
A lot of companies have depreciation chargessustainable.
that adequately mirror maintenance cap-exOne important caveat though: many companies in
requirements. That isn’t to say the twothe same industry are not competitors, and
items are necessarily the same amount; but, thetherefore cap-ex comparisons between them are
extent to which they diverge from each other isof little use. For example, Strattec (STRT) and
not terribly specific to the business. The mostLear (LEA) both make auto parts. However, they
obvious reason for a major divergence is inflation.aren't competitors. Lear makes interiors; Strattec
Regardless, stocks with similar P/E ratios generallymakes locks.
also have similar “owners’The lock business is not the same as the interior
earnings” multiples.business. The industries aren't equally profitable
This isn’t true if the assets on the bookand they aren't equally competitive. You have to
don’t really need to be replaced toanalyze each business separately - just as you
maintain the same earnings power. Somecan't lump (AMZN) and 1-800-PetMeds together,
businesses do have assets that need to beeven though they both sell a lot of stuff on the
maintained (brand, technology, etc.) – but,web.
these assets are maintained as a part of dailyAny consideration of cap-ex spending and how it's
operations and are not broken out as a separatereally divided between "maintenance" and
item (it would be nearly impossible to separate"investment" has to begin with your assessment
“brand maintenance” from otherof the nature of the industry in general and the
expenses anyway).specific competitive position of the company
The most conspicuous examples of such brandyou're looking at.
maintenance are all the ads you see for GEICO,Then, you can start making cap-ex comparisons.
1-800-PetMeds, etc. At least in these two cases,But, don't allow yourself to become unduly wed
there is no doubt such advertising creates anto the numbers. Bring your understanding of
economic asset that helps generate earnings inwhat's needed to maintain and expand the
future periods.particular business and what competitors are likely
Such spending is not treated as a capitalto do (and the unintended consequences those
investment. Therefore, GAAP accounting tends tolikely actions will produce).
exaggerate the actual cost of day-to-daySome industries are easy. Unless you have a
operations for these businesses and understatevery special case, a steel company's cap-ex will
the amount of additional investment in thebe determined by the long-term economics of the
business (both GEICO and 1-800-PetMeds aresteel industry (which is not extraordinarily
heavily investing in future growth –profitable). You aren't going to find one company
it’s just that those investmentsthat can skimp on capital spending - they all have
aren’t in the form of tangible assets suchto ante up each round.
as a new plant).At any one time, the numbers for the last few
I’m sure it sounds like I’m takingyears may not make this fact obvious, but you'll
quite a leap here. After all, there have beenknow it, because of the qualitative judgments you
businesses that argued for the amortization ofbring to your analysis of any particular steel
certain operating expenses that clearly did notcompany. Just as your qualitative judgments
have much of a useful life. You may remember aabout 1-800-PetMeds would have helped you
few such instances from the late 90s. However, arealize the low cap-ex spending there was
review of the past financials for PetMeds Expressperfectly fine, because the real investment was
(PETS) illustrates my point. Since 2000, thethe advertising. These are the things the numbers
company’s revenues have increasedalone can’t tell you.
roughly tenfold while net Property, Plant, and