Models For Predicting Corporate Financial Distress

type="text/javascript">in combination (Altman, Marco, and Varetto 1994).
INTRODUCTION 2 MEASURING FINANCIALAltman's Z Score Based on multiple discriminate
HEALTH 2 FINANCIAL DISTRESS 2 FACTORSanalysis (MDA), the model predicts a company's
AFFECTING FINANCIAL HEALTH 3 Capitalfinancial health based on a discriminant function of
Structure and Capital Adequacy 3 Operating Cashthe form:
Flows and Cost Structure 4 Earnings Capacity 4Z=0.012X1+0.014X2+0.033X3+0.006X4+0.999X5
Liquidity 4 Asset Conversions — "GrowingWhere: X1=working capital/total assets
Broke" 5 Asset Utilisation Efficiency/Turnover 5X2=retained earnings/total assets X3=earnings
Strategic Position 5 PREDICTING FINANCIALbefore interest and taxes/total assets
DISTRESS 6 FAILURE PREDICTION MODELS 7X4=market value of equity/book value of total
Altman's Z Score 8 Logit Analysis: The Model 9liabilities X5=sales/total assets The Z-Score model
Other Statistical Failure Prediction Models 10 The(developed in 1968) was based on a sample
Gambler's Ruin Models 10 Alternative Models -composed of 66 manufacturing companies with
Artificial Neural Networks 12 CONCLUSION 1233 firms in each of two matched-pair groups. The
REFERENCES 13 Introduction A company tryingbankruptcy group consisted of companies that
to achieve its business plan faces problems similarfiled a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 11 of
to those faced by a driver embarking on a longthe United States bankruptcy act from 1946
trip. The likelihood that car and driver will reachthrough 1965. Based on the sample, all firms
their destination is dependent on: 1) how muchhaving a Z-Score greater than 2.99 clearly fell into
fuel is in the car's tank upon starting out, 2) thethe non-bankruptcy sector, while those firms
car's fuel efficiency, 3) how many service stationshaving a Z-Score below 1.81 were bankrupt.
will be available to refill the car's fuel tank alongAltman subsequently developed a revised Z-Score
the way and 4) whether the car's fuel tank ismodel (with revised coefficients and Z-Score
large enough to cover unexpected accidents,cut-offs) which dropped variables X4 and X5
delays, and detours along the way. Similarly,(above) and replaced them with a new variable
whether or not a company survives in a highlyX4 = net worth (book value)/total liabilities. The
competitive business environment is dependentX5 variable was dropped to minimise potential
upon: 1) how financially healthy the corporation isindustry effects related to asset turnover. Around
at its inception, 2) the company's ability (and1977, Altman developed jointly with a private
relative flexibility and efficiency) in creating cashfinancial firm (ZETA Services, Inc.) a revised
from its continuing operations, 3) the company'sseven-variable ZETA model based on a combined
access to capital markets, and 4) the company'ssample of 113 manufacturers and retailers. The
financial capacity and staying power when facedZETA model is allegedly far more accurate in
with unplanned cash shortfalls. Measuring Financialbankruptcy classification in years 2 through 5 with
Health There is no single measure of financialthe initial year's accuracy about equal. However,
health. Ideally, solvency could be measured along athe coefficients of the model are not specified
continuum in the same way that fuel sufficiency(without retaining ZETA Services). The ZETA
can be measured using a car's petrol gauge. Fullmodel is based on the following variables:
health would equate with having a full tank of fuel. return on assets  stability of
Poor health would be equivalent to showing anearnings  debt service 
empty tank. As healthiness progressivelycumulative profitability  liquidity/current
decreased, the solvency gauge would registerratio  capitalisation (five year average of
movement in the direction of relative insolvency.total market value)  size (total tangible
Ultimately, as healthiness continues to decline, theassets) Logit Analysis: The Model Application of
solvency gauge would hopefully flash a warningthe logit model requires four steps. 1. a series of
light. Since, in the real world, no single measure ofseven financial ratios are calculated. 2. each ratio is
financial health exists, proxies that measuremultiplied by a coefficient unique to that ratio. This
various aspects of solvency are often combinedcoefficient can be either positive or negative. 3.
to estimate a company's healthiness at a point inthe resulting values are summed together (y). 4.
time. Financial Distress As a financially healthythe probability of bankruptcy for a firm is
company becomes more and more financiallycalculated as the inverse of (1 + ey). Explanatory
distressed, it ultimately enters an area of greatvariables with a negative coefficient increase the
danger. Changes to the company's operations andprobability of bankruptcy because they reduce ey
capital structure (ie. restructuring) must be madetoward zero, with the result that the bankruptcy
to remain healthy. Apple Computers' attempts inprobability function approaches 1/1, or 100
recent years to restructure its operations topercent. Likewise, independent variables with a
survive in the highly competitive computerpositive coefficient decrease the probability of
hardware business is a good example of abankruptcy (Stickney 1996). Table 1 shows the
company trying to dramatically restructure itself infinancial ratios used in the logit model and their
order to maintain solvency. Continued decreasesrespective coefficients. TABLE 1 — Financial
in financial health ultimately lead to insolvency andRatios used in Logit Model FINANCIAL RATIO
then potentially, bankruptcy. Available evidenceCOEFFICIENT + 0.23883 Average Inventories
suggests many companies do not adequatelySales - 0.108 Average Receivables/Average
attempt to resolve their financial health problemsInventories - 1.583 (Cash + Marketable Securities)
until it is too late to avoid bankruptcy. FactorsTotal Assets - 10.78 Quick Assets/Current
Affecting Financial Health Capital Structure andLiabilities + 3.074 Income from Continuing
Capital Adequacy Companies finance theirOperations/(Total Assets - Current Liabilities) +
long-term operations primarily through two0.486 Long-Term Debt/(Total Assets - Current
sources of capital - debt and equity. One of theLiabilities) - 4.35 Sales/(Net Working Capital +
most important financing decisions a companyFixed Assets) + 0.11 y = Sum of (Coefficient *
makes is the proportion of debt to owner's equityRatio) Probability of Bankruptcy = 1/(1 + ey)
in the company's capital structure. SummaryOther Statistical Failure Prediction Models Many
measures of a company's capital structure includeadditional bankruptcy prediction models have been
the company's debt to equity ratio (D/E) anddeveloped since the work of Beaver and Altman.
debt to total capital ratio (D/(D+E)). Interest andLev (1974), Deakin (1977), Ohlson (1980), Taffler
principal payments on debt must be paid from(1980), Platt & Platt (1990), Gilbert, Menon, and
operations before any payments can beSchwartz (1990), and Koh and Killough (1990)
distributed to equity holders (in the form ofamongst others have continued to refine the
dividends or share buy-backs). Therefore, thedevelopment of multivariate statistical models.
interest and principal, which must be paid on debt,Almost all of these traditional models have been
are considered fixed-costs of operations. From aneither matched-pair multi-discriminate models or
operational point-of-view, the extent of thelogit models. A 1997 study by Begley, Ming and
burden of these fixed obligations can beWatts concludes: "Given that Ohlson's original
measured relative to the company's continuingmodel is frequently used in academic research as
ability to pay the fixed obligations. A frequentlyan indicator of financial distress, its strong
used measure of a company's ability to cover itsperformance in this study supports its use as a
interest payments is its earnings before interestpreferred model." The Gambler's Ruin Models
and taxes and before depreciation andWilcox (1971 and 1976), Santomero (1977), Vinso
amortisation (EBITDA) to its interest expense. A(1979) and others have adapted a gambler's ruin
company is financially distressed whenever itsapproach to bankruptcy prediction. Under this
EBITDA is less than its interest expense.approach, bankruptcy is probable when a
 Financial leverage involves thecompany's net liquidation value (NLV) becomes
substitution of fixed-cost debt for owner's equitynegative. Net liquidation value is defined as total
in the hope of increasing equity returns. Asasset liquidation value less total liabilities. From one
demonstrated by Higgins and others, financialperiod to the next, a company's NLV is increased
leverage improves financial performance whenby cash inflows and decreased by cash outflows
things are going well but worsens financialduring the period. Wilcox combined the cash
performance when things are going poorly.inflows and outflows and defined them as
Therefore, increasing the ratio of debt to equity inadjusted cash flow. All other things being equal,
a company's capital structure implicitly makes thethe probability of a company's failure increases,
company relatively less solvent (on the downside)the smaller the company's beginning NLV, the
and more financially risky than a company withoutsmaller the company's adjusted (net) cash flow,
debt.  Capital adequacy relates toand the larger the variation of the company's
whether a company has enough capital to financeadjusted cash flow over time. Wilcox uses the
its planned future operations. If the company'sgambler's ruin formula (Feller, 1968) to show that
capital is inadequate, then it must either be ablea company's risk of failure is dependent on; 1) the
to: 1) successfully issue new equity, or 2) arrangeabove factors plus, 2) the size of the company's
new debt. The amount of debt a company canadjusted cash flow at risk each period (ie. the size
successfully absorb and repay from its continuingof the company's bet). Using a more robust
operations is normally referred to as thestatistical technique, Vinso (1979) extended
company's debt capacity. Capital adequacy isWilcox's gambler's ruin model to develop a safety
normally evaluated by looking at the company'sindex. Based on input concerning the variability of
operational cash flow projections and itsexpected contribution margin amounts, the index
projections of capital needs. When companiescan be used to predict the point in time when a
undertake major new projects or undergo acompany's ruin is most likely to occur (called first
significant financial restructuring they oftenpassage time). The statistics used in gambler's ruin
perform financial feasibility studies to determineapproaches are somewhat formidable (especially
whether the company has the financial capacityto the average reader). However, both Wilcox
to undertake the project and whether theand Vinso richly describe some of the factors
company will be able to repay all future debtwhich most affect business failure. For example,
payments once the project is built. OperatingWilcox states: "The (cash) inflow rate ... can be
Cash Flows and Cost Structure All other factorsincreased through higher average return on
being equal, companies that can consistentlyinvestment. However, having a major impact here
generate positive cash flows from operations willusually requires long-term changes in strategic
remain relatively more solvent than those thatposition. This is difficult to control over a short
cannot. This requires that operating cash inflowstime period except by divestitures of peripheral
(collections or sales) consistently exceed operatingunprofitable businesses...The average outflow rate
cash outflows (costs). Companies whichis controlled by managing the average growth
experience erratic cash outflows and inflows arerate of corporate assets. Effective capital
relatively more risky because they are less likely,budgeting ... requires resource allocation
in one or more time periods, to be able to coveremphasising those business units, which have the
fixed expenses/outflows. Companies which havehighest future payoff. The size of the bet is the
a higher proportion of fixed costs to variableleast understood factor in financial risk. Yet
costs are also relatively more risky and relativelymanagement has substantial control over it.
less solvent than companies with a relativelyVariability in liquidity flows governs the size of the
lower proportion of fixed costs in their operatingbet. This variability can be managed through
cost structure. Earnings Capacity All other thingsdividend policy, through limiting earning variability
being equal, companies with higher relativeand investment variability, and through controlling
earnings and higher relative returns on investmentthe co-variation between profits and
will remain more solvent than their less fortunateinvestments...True earnings smoothing is attained
competitors. The most commonly used financialby control of exposure to volatile industries,
measures of earnings capacity are earningsdiversification, and improved strategic position."
before interest and taxes (EBIT) and net income.Vinso supports Wilcox's emphasis on cash flow
Liquidity Adequate liquidity is a further necessaryprocesses and stresses the importance of debt
component of solvency. Frequently used liquiditycapacity: "Before deriving a mathematical model
measures include: a) working capital (currentfor determining the risk of ruin, it is necessary to
assets minus current liabilities), b) current ratiodescribe the process. First, a firm has some pool
(current assets divided by current liabilities), and c)of resources at time = 0 of some size U0, which
quick ratio (cash, marketable securities andare available to prevent ruin (similar to Wilcox's
accounts receivable divided by current liabilities).beginning NAV). Then, earnings come to the firm
To evaluate liquidity, each of the assets andfrom revenue(s)...less the costs incurred in
liabilities on a company's balance sheet should beproducing the revenues. There are two types of
evaluated for liquidity. Current assets are thosecosts to be considered: variable, which change
which will likely be converted to cash within oneaccording to the stochastic nature of the revenue
year or less. Current liabilities are those whichsources, and fixed costs, which do not vary with
must be paid within one year. However, when arevenue but are a function of the period. So,
company becomes financially distressed, evenrevenue less variable costs...can be defined as
assets which are normally considered currentvariable profit (which is available to pay fixed
assets (accounts receivable and stock, forcosts). If Ut is less than zero, ruin occurs because
example) may become relatively "illiquid".no funds are available to meet unpaid fixed
Long-term assets, in general, are far less liquidcosts...These definitions, however, ignore debt
than current assets. Some longer-term assetscapacity, if available, which must be included as
may be very "illiquid". Also, as stated above, oftenthe firm can use this source without being forced
a company's long-term liabilities can becometo confront shareholders, creditors or
immediately due and payable if the companybankruptcy,...debt holders or other creditors will
violates contractual debt covenants or otherforce reorganisation if a firm is unable to meet
obligations. Wilcox (1976) argues that net liquidationcontractual obligations because working capital is
value provides a solid conceptual basis fortoo low and the firm cannot obtain more debt."
evaluating a company's liquidity. Net liquidationAlternative Models - Artificial Neural Networks
value is defined as total asset liquidation value lessSince 1990, another promising approach to
total liabilities. Wilcox (1976) applies what he callsbankruptcy prediction, based on the use of neural
typical (not definitive) valuation multipliers tonetworks, has evolved. Artificial Neural Networks
balance sheet assets to arrive at representative(ANN) are computers constructed to process
asset liquidation values:  Cash Equivalentsinformation, in parallel, similar to the human brain.
100%  Other Current Assets 70%ANN's store information in the form of patterns
 Long Term Assets 50% Wilcox (1976)and are able to learn from their processing
shows that a company becomes bankrupt whenexperience. Unlike MDA and logit analyses, ANN's
net liquidation value is reduced to zero. Assetimpose less restrictive data requirements (the
Conversions — "Growing Broke" Asset andrequirement for linearity, for example) and are
liability conversions are continuously ongoing in anyespecially useful in recognising and learning
dynamic business. Operationally, the company iscomplex data relationships. Recent ANN
selling its products thereby creating cash inflows.bankruptcy prediction studies include those of Bell,
Alternatively, sales may be made on credit,et al. (1990), Hansen & Messier (1991), Chung &
increasing the company's accounts receivable.Tam (1992), Liang, et al. (1992), Tam & Kiang
Concurrently, inventories are produced and sold(1992), Salchenberger (1993), Coats & Fant
and production and operating expenses are(1993), Fanning & Cogger (1994), Brockett, et al.
incurred to continue operations. If a company's(1994), Boritz, et al. (1995), and Etheridge &
inventories and accounts receivable grow fasterSiriam (1995 and 1997). Research has shown that
than the corresponding growth in the company'sANN's offer a viable alternative to other more
sales and accounts payable, liquidity will betraditional methods of bankruptcy prediction. The
negatively affected. Strategic asset conversionsability of the model to learn allows for the
are also ongoing, but with less regularity. Decisionsconstant re-calibration and validation of the model,
to invest in 'bricks and mortar' and otherwhich helps increase classification rates. From a
long-term investments are made and debt andtheoretical perspective, ANN's are more desirable
equity are obtained to supply the capital neededbecause they make fewer assumptions about the
to pay for them. Slowly but surely, companiesdata normality and linear separability. One of the
can 'go broke' when assets are converted to lessmain disadvantages of ANN's is the inability to
liquid forms over a sustained time period. This canassign intuition the network weights. Another
happen when the company's assets grow fasterdisadvantage is that the model might simply
than the company's sales (often the case formemorise the data as opposed to forming a
many start-up companies). When this happens,general set of classification rules, which can cause
the company becomes more highly leveraged andestimates on future samples to be less reliable.
less solvent. Similarly, a company whose longConclusion Future research in bankruptcy
term investment decisions do not pay off inprediction should analyse the economic and
terms of planned operating returns (thusinstitutional factors that can impact the reasons
increasing fixed cost structures and decreasingfor bankruptcy. Jones (1987) indicated that the
operating cash flows), will become less solvent.lack of homogeneity in the motivation for a
Asset Utilisation Efficiency/Turnover Thosebankruptcy filing might complicate the modelling
companies, which survive, use their human andeffort. Although normally motivated by an effort
capital assets relatively efficiently. That is, theyto resolve severe financial problems, a firm may
have relatively higher returns on investment (ROI)file for bankruptcy primarily to void a union
and higher returns per employee than lesscontract or for other legal reasons (Jones 1987).
successful competitors. They achieve relativelyAnother area where models can be improved is in
higher returns through superior assetcatering for predictor variables other than financial
management (capital and human assets) andratios may prove beneficial. For example,
through superior strategic positioning. In themeasures of management experience,
absence of aggressive asset management,management expertise, or other behavioural
companies must usually resort to wholesale assetaspects that impact the operations of the firm
divestitures and/or are forced to restructure tocould be significant in a bankruptcy prediction
fund their continuing operations. Strategic Positionmodel. Additionally, including variables that control
Schoffler (Buzzell and Gale, 1987) and others havefor a changing economic environment may
documented the high correlation between positiveprovide valuable insights for predicting bankruptcy.
returns on investment and such factors as: 1)Bibliography References Altman, Edward I.
higher relative market shares, 2) relative productCorporate Financial Distress. New York, NY: John
quality and 3) lower relative capital intensity.Wiley and Sons, 1983. Altman, Edward I. (1968)
Companies that have strong strategic marketFinancial Ratios, Discriminate Analysis and the
positions are more likely to experience higherPrediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, The Journal
relative returns on investment than theirof Finance. Altman, Edward I. Homepage of
competitors. These positive returns, in turn,Professor Edward I. Altman, New York, NY: Stern
increase the solvency of the market leaders.School of Business. Available at Altman, Edward I,
Those competitors that have lower marketGiancarlo Marco, and Franco Varetto (1994)
shares or lower product quality are less likely toCorporate Distress Diagnosis: Comparisons Using
achieve industry average returns and are thusLinear Discriminant Analysis and Neural Networks
more likely to become less solvent in the future.(the Italian Experience), The Journal of Banking
Predicting Financial Distress In America, each yearand Finance. Altman, Edward I. and Thomas P.
approximately one percent of all firms required toMcGough (1974) Evaluation of a Company as a
file with the Securities and Exchange CommissionGoing Concern, The Journal of Accountancy.
file for bankruptcy. The American BankruptcyBeaver, W., 1967, Financial Ratios as Predictors of
Institute reports that around 50,000 businessesFailures, in Empirical Research in Accounting,
filed for bankruptcy in 1997. Attempts to developJournal of Accounting Research. Begley, J., Ming, J.,
bankruptcy prediction models began seriouslyWatts, S., 1997,Bankruptcy Classification Errors in
sometime in the late 1960's and continue throughthe 1980s: An Empirical Analysis of Altman's and
today. At least three distinct types of modelsOhlson's Models, Review of Accounting Studies.
have been used to predict bankruptcy: a)Bell, T.B., G.S. Ribar and J. Verchio, 1990, Neural
statistical models (univariate analysis, multipleNets Versus Logistic Regression: A Comparison of
discriminate analyses [MDA]), and conditional logitEach Model's Ability to Predict Commercial Bank
regression analyses, b) gambler'sFailures," Boritz, J.E., D.B. Kennedy and A.M.
ruin-mathematical/statistical models, and c) artificialAlbuquerque, 1995, Predicting Corporate Failure
neural network models. Each of these models isUsing a Neural Network Approach, Intelligent
discussed below. Most of the publicly availableSystems in Accounting, Finance and Management.
information regarding prediction models is basedBrockett, P.L., W.W. Cooper, L.L. Golden and U.
on research published by academics. CommercialPitaktong, 1994, A Neural Network Method for
banks, public accounting firms and otherObtaining an Early Warning of Insurer Insolvency.
institutional entities (ratings agencies, for example)The Journal of Risk and Insurance. Buzzell, R.D.,
appear to be the primary beneficiaries of thisGale, B.T., 1987, The PIMS Principles Linking
research, since they can use the information toStrategy to Performance, New York: The Free
minimise their exposure to potential client failures.Press. Chung, H.M. and K. Y. Tam, 1992, A
While continuing research has been ongoing forComparative Analysis of Inductive-Learning
almost thirty years, it is interesting to note thatAlgorithms, Intelligent Systems in Accounting,
no unified well-specified theory of how and whyFinance and Management. Coats, P.K. and L.F. Fant,
corporations fail has yet been developed. The1993, Recognizing Financial Distress Patterns Using
available statistical models derive merely from thea Neural Network Tool, Financial Management.
statistical optimisation of a set of ratios. As statedCook, Roy A. and Jeryl L. Nelson. A Conspectus
by Wilcox (1973) the lack of conceptualof Business Failure Forecasting, Available at
framework results in the limited amount ofDeakin, E., Business Failure Prediction: An Empirical
available data on bankrupt firms being statisticallyAnalysis,, 1977, in E. Altman and A. Sametz, eds.,
'used up' by the search before a usefulFinancial Crises: Institutions and Markets in a Fragile
generalisation emerges. How useful are theseEnvironment, New York: Wiley. Etheridge, H.L. and
models? Almost universally, the decision criterionR.S. Sriram, 1995, A Neural Network Approach to
used to evaluate the usefulness of the modelsFinancial Distress Analysis, Advances in Accounting
has been how well they classify a company asInformation Systems. Fanning, K. and K.O. Cogger,
solvent or non-solvent compared to the1994, A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural
company's actual status known after-the-fact.Networks Using Financial Distress Prediction,
Most of the studies consider a type I error as theIntelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and
classification of a failed company as healthy, andManagement. Gilbert, L.R., Menon, K., and
consider a type II error as the classification of aSchwartz, K.B., 1990, Predicting Bankruptcy for
healthy company as failed. In general, type IFirms in Financial Distress, Journal of Business
errors are considered more costly to most usersFinance and Accounting. Hansen, J.V. and W.F.
than type II errors. The usefulness of fail/non-failMessier, 1991,Artificial Neural Networks:
prediction models is suggested by Ohlson (1980)Foundations and Application to a Decision Problem,
"...real world problems concern themselves withExpert Systems with Applications. Jones, F. L.
choices which have a richer set of possible1987. Current Techniques in Bankruptcy Prediction.
outcomes. No decision problem I can think of hasJournal of Accounting Literature. Koh, H.C. and
a payoff space which is partitioned naturally intoKillough, L.N., 1990, The Use of Multiple Discriminant
the binary status bankruptcy versusAnalysis in the Assessment of the Going-concern
non-bankruptcy...I have also refrained from makingStatus of an Audit Client, Journal of Business
inferences regarding the relative usefulness ofFinance and Accounting. Lev, B., 1974, Financial
alternative models, ratios and predictive systems...Statement Analysis, A New Approach. Englewood
Most of the analysis should simply be viewed asCliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Liang, T.P., J.S. Chandler, I.
descriptive statistics - which may, to someHa
extent, include estimated prediction error-rates -This article is free for republishing
and no theories of bankruptcy or usefulness ofSource:
financial ratios are tested." Subject to the
qualifications expressed above, bankruptcy
prediction models continue to be used to predictRelated Articles
failure. Failure Prediction Models The early historyA good dental insurance policy can make your
of researchers' attempts to classify and predictsmile brighter
business failure (and bankruptcy) is wellBusiness Insurance
documented in Edward Altman's 1983 book,Consumer credit 101- What You Absolutely Need
Corporate Financial Distress. Statistical predictionto Know
models are more generally better known asApartment Loan 101
measures of financial distress. Three stages in theUser guide to payday loan terminologies What
development of statistical financial distress modelsYour Mama Never Told You About Business
exist: 1. univariate analysis, 2. multivariate (orCredit Cards
multi-discriminate [MDA]) analysis, and 3. logitDrive away the car of your dreams
analysis. Univariate analysis assumes that a singleKippers or red herrings?
variable can be used for predictive purposesEthical finance: who benefits from our spending?
(Cook and Nelson 1998). The univariate model asSave Time With a Bridge Loan
proposed by William Beaver achieved a moderateRelated Articles
level of predictive accuracy (Sheppard 1994).Alternative ways to avoid payday loan
Univariate analysis identified factors related toHelp to get out of debt
financial distress, however, it did not provide aDo you know what you're worth?
measure of the relevant risk (Stickney 1996). InForex Trading Best Practices
the next stage of financial distress measurement,Lead Companies, Eight Features To Consider
multivariate analysis (also known as multipleResidual Income - What It Is and Why You Need
discriminant analysis or MDA) attempted toIt
overcome the potentially conflicting indications thatLife Insurance Settlements-Capitalizing On Your
may result from using single variables (Cook andPolicies
Nelson 1998). The best-known, and most-widelyWhat Your Mama Never Told You About Debt
used, multiple discriminant analysis method is theConsolidation Services
one proposed by Edward Altman. Altman'sPersonal loan 101- What You Absolutely Need to
z-score, or zeta model, combined variousKnow
measures of profitability or risk. The resultingResidential Income Property Financing: Part 2 of 3
model was one that demonstrated a company'sGovernment loans for beginners
risk of bankruptcy relative to a standard. Altman'sGovernment grant writing for beginners
initial study proved his model to be very accurate;Life Settlement: Towards A Free Market for Life
it correctly predicted bankruptcy in 94% of theInsurance
initial sample (Altman 1968). Despite the positiveThe Hitchhiker's Guide To Insanity
results of his study, Altman's model had a key7 Years At The Keyboard
weakness; it assumed variables in the sampleShorn of the debt responsibility
data to be normally distributed. If all variables areDisability insurance 101- What You Absolutely
not normally distributed, the methods employedNeed to Know
may result in selection of an inappropriate set ofAre you running the risk of an uninsured business?
predictors (Sheppard 1994). Chistine ZavgrenBeware get a "Business insurance"
developed a model that corrected for this"Where Is America Headed To?", New York
problem. Her model used logit analysis to predictMillionaire Wonders…
bankruptcy. Due to its use of logit analysis, her4 things to watch out for when choosing a
model is considered more robust (Lo 1986).mortgage company
Further, logit analysis actually provides a probability
(in terms of a percentage) of bankruptcy. Also,Ask a Question About this Article
the probability calculated might be considered a>> WHO MADE DIECAST MODEL
measure of the effectiveness of management (ie.TROLLEYBUS 1.50 (approx ...
effective management will not lead a company to>> Is there such a thing as comfortable high
the verge of bankruptcy). During the 1980s andheels?
1990s, the trend has been to use logit analysis in>> How does forming a limited liability
favour of multiple discriminant analysis (Stickneycorporation ...
1996). More recently, logit analysis has been>> Do you think that doomsday predictions
compared to a more advanced analytical tool,that are about to occur in the year of 2012 are
neural networks. Research has found that thereal?
approaches perform similarly and should be used