Isn't it the Time to Terminate the Debate Around Earnings Management?

In recent years, much attention has beenpractices as immoral and unethical as well as they
devoted to ethical conduct of accountants. Criticsdistorting the application of GAAP. However, this
have alleged that ethics have deteriorated andline of arguments seriously ignore too many facts,
that the interests of users of financial statementsmainly these that can be found in the accounting
and financial reports have been subordinated totheory--the mother. On the one hand, one of the
the desires of prepares of such reports toapproaches for accounting theory is the ethical
present a favorable picture of financial status ofapproach which emphasis on concepts of justice,
reporting entity. Perhaps such critics havefairness and truth. Each one of these concepts
received their increasing power, by far, from thehas found its way into the conceptual framework
earnings management literature – as ancreated by FASB in forms such, reliability,
extension for Book Cooking – which has beenrelevancy and natural, nonetheless the theory
the subject of much accounting research overitself had revealed high confusion regarding ethics
the past three decades. In that literature, there isas in the question of "What is the term Truth
documented ample evidence that firmsmean? And it has confessed that ethics are
intentionally "manage" or "dampen" fluctuationssomething of judgment in the mind of
around some predetermine earnings target, andpractitioners of accounting. This confusion also has
earnings management has been described astransmitted into an ongoing confliction between
distorting the application of generally acceptedreliability and relevancy within the qualitative
principles accordingly. Within this vein, on the othercharacteristic of accounting information. On the
hand, the recent scandals at Enron and WorldComother hand, the economic approach for the
have generated a public perception that earningsaccounting theory calls for employing accounting
management behavior is utilized opportunistically(through the financial reports) in macroeconomic
by firm managers for their own self-interestpolicies, that is, by considering the objective of
rather than for the interest of the shareholders.reporting stable earnings across the years
Together, these facts rise the par of pressurelegitimizes the use of reserves and flexible
over the financial and investment communities,depreciation polices. Isn’t that what being
mainly the SEC, and pushed them towardknown as income smoothing (a special form of
tightening accounting standards [for "example"earnings management)? And, wasn’t it
Sarbanes-Oxley Act – 2002, a developmentoriginally made in accounting theory? In addition,
of an extensive inspection program by Publicthis is Paul Rosenfield – who was the director
Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB),of the AICPA accounting standards division for 14
addition requirements made by NYSE andyears – in an article titled "What Drives
NASDAQ for member firms, and the InternationalEarnings Management?" explains deeply how U.S.
Accounting Standards Board (IASB 2003)GAAP as currently designed fails pervasively to
improvements project which eliminated accountingprovide the meaning of transparency in financial
options in several standards]. Finally, in shortreporting.
words, earnings manipulation's practices have beenAccording to the common belief, the central
as "immoral", "cheating" and "unethical in the eyequestion for standard setters and regulators is to
of most practitioners, theorists, and regulators indecide how much judgment to allow management
the accounting field where, such consensus hadto exercise in financial reporting. Where, it is
been inherent in the early studies (1960s) aboutbelieved that standard setters are likely to be
these financial phenomena and found its officialinterested in evidence on how management uses
way as a part of standards on the hand ofor misuses judgment permitted under accounting
institute of management accountants IMA bystandards. Conceivably, after the empirical
issuing the "standards of ethical conduct forevidence had been well documented around the
practitioners of management accounting andGAAP flexibility as a main source of the increasing
financial management" in 1983 followed by anearnings management practices, and after the
issuing from financial executive institute FEI calledtotal incurred costs of earnings management had
" code of ethics" in 1985, and then by Americanbeen considered huge (as in his 1998
institute of certified public accountants AICPA“Numbers Game” speech, former SEC
which issued the revised "code of professionalChairman, Arthur Levitt charged that widely
ethics". Thenceforward, FASB, GASB, and auditingpublicized accounting problems, which earnings
standard board have adhered to these rules andmanagement is one of them, at a considerable
standards in ethics.number of firms ware in danger of undermining
Surely, the story of earnings management couldU.S. capital markets), it was supposed that
not be fully told in few lines especially, when astandard setters will make fundamental
long line of literature in this vein is considered.amendments in the wide options in standards
However, it is worth to remember that neitherrather than rise the power of inspection on
additional standards nor putting ethics in form ofauditing firms. Furthermore, many of the revised
cods and standards have conduced to onestatements of FASB that have been issued in
beneficial result concerning reducing thesepast few years allow additional flexibility and
practices, except that practices have becomecontains more options for managers, herby places
something of a religion for firms' executives. So, insubstantial burden on auditors to detect such
regards to the ethical aspect of this story, is itpractices. However, auditors may never be able
true that earnings management practices areto detect real earnings manipulations in which
unethical? If it is, who must charge themanagers left the options and move toward
responsibility? And, for more than 40 years ofmanaging short-run real economic activities.
extensive works in this area (i.e. earningsAfter all, to date this area has witnessed much of
manipulations in general), the exploration of athe accounting researches that have the ultimate
pragmatic solution has not been reached evengoal of providing a bas for standard setters so
alluded, and there is no signal it will be so in thethat these "unethical" practices can be reduced
foreseeable future, simply why?! Such questionsefficiently… May it is well known that advertising
have no typical and specific direct answers amongis defined sometimes as "legal lie", at the same
the literature genres and regulators' speeches.time, ads are rights for any firms. Such line of
Properly, the answers, for the most part, arereasoning can be applied to earnings management
considered not scientific to be mentioned!!, orby which executives legally attempt to draw a
perhaps For a "TRUE" problem, there is nofavorable picture for their firms' performance.
solution. Whatever the reason was however,One last item, pragmatically, Arthur Levitt
these questions are the ultimate aims of thisstatement (1998), “While the problem of
article which attempts to draw, as possible,earnings management is not new, it has swelled in
scientific answers but bounded by the businessa market that is unforgiving of companies that
and economics sciences framework.miss their estimates”, carried more than a
As it was mentioned before, most genres ofsense of sympathy, it is much closed to concede
earnings management literature and financialthat earnings management is factual behavior.
communities' speeches have convicted these