How Relationships Can Reveal Who We Are

We have often heard the old proverb "birds of adisappointed or hurt. This may seem difficult to
feather flock together". While this idea was aroundunderstand at first, but it is reality. How we
even before psychology became a subject,respond to our partners - and their behaviour or
George Mead was one of the first social thinkersactions - is based on who we are. If we are
to propose a theory of the "self". The basic ideaconstantly feeling negative emotions, it reflects
was that the individual existed only in the contextthat some our needs or expectations are not
of a group. Ironically, we become individualsbeing met. Anger, for example, is viewed as a
through our relationships with others. There aresecondary emotion. The initial emotion tends to be
those who are close to us (significant others) andfear or hurt. Anger is a defence mechanism such
the faint acquaintances and strangers (generalisedthat when we are angry, it reveals more about
others).ourselves than the stimulus that makes us angry.
Our relationships with our significant others tendThe interaction we have with our partners are
to satisfy our needs more than our relationshipstypically relate to needs, known or unknown,
with anyone outside of that group. The opinionswhich are being met or left unfulfilled. Initially, the
and attitudes of our in-group tend to have atype of partners we seek, tend to reflect our
greater impact on us. Within the significant others,personal values and priorities. We tend to seek
an intimate romantic relationship is typically at thethe qualities that we believe would help us to
apex. People expect to have the majority of theirmeet those needs, make us content or complete
needs fulfilled in such relationships.us.
Intimate relationships tend to reveal who we areSometimes, we get caught in a blame game that
by reflecting our deepest fears, needs anddoes not allow us to realise our own contribution
desires. As a relationship grows in intimacy, itto relationship problems. We blame the other
reflects our innermost realm increasingly.person and claim that the other person is "too
Relationships thus act as mirrors by facilitatingneedy" or "too demanding" for example. We fail
greater self-understanding. Even from the outset,to acknowledge the fact that the partner may
the type of people we seek as life partnersnot be perceived as such in a previous or future
reveal a great deal about our preferences,intimate relationship with someone else. Since we
priorities and values. Then during the relationship,cannot remove ourselves completely from the
how we respond to and treat our partners wouldpicture, it is logical to conclude that much of what
be determined by how developed and assured weoccurs in an intimate relationship is, at the very
are.least, a part-reflection of ourselves.
The process of projection is critical toIf we continue to grant power to our significant
understanding why relationships act as clearothers, they would continue to reflect the aspects
mirrors. When we project our feelings and desiresof ourselves that we don't like or wish not to be
onto another person, we tend to interpret thatreminded of. Only when we reclaim this power,
persons actions or behaviour in light of our latentsomething Dr. Gary Smalley refers to as the
needs. Dr. Gary Smalley discussed this at length in"Power of One", we would be less bothered by
"The DNA of relationships". Our feelings - aboutthe things that our partner may do (unless what
what our partner does or who our partner isyour partner does is fundamentally insidious). The
should be fully-owned by us.undeniable fact is that our selection process and
We should not blame our partner for how werelationship-handling abilities reveal a lot about the
feel. Our partner cannot make us angry,hidden or innermost aspects of ourselves.